Connect with us

Latest

University of Tennessee sues Anthropic over AI patent infringement

Published

on

The image is AI-generated and used for illustration purposes only

ISLAMABAD – The research arm of the University of Tennessee has filed a lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Anthropic, accusing it of infringing patents related to neural networks and machine-learning technology. The complaint, filed in the US District Court for the District of Delaware, alleges that Anthropic’s artificial intelligence systems unlawfully use technology protected under patents owned by the University of Tennessee Research Foundation (UTRF).

About the patented technologies

According to the lawsuit, the patents represent significant innovations in artificial intelligence, machine learning, neuromorphic computing and neuroscience-inspired computing. Professors at the University of Tennessee developed the patented technologies, which remain protected under US patent law.

The foundation argued that Anthropic’s alleged disregard for intellectual property extends beyond copyright issues and includes patented AI technologies.

“Anthropic’s cavalier approach to others’ intellectual property rights in the development of its products extends beyond the use of copyrighted material,” the complaint states. The university is seeking unspecified monetary damages and a court order preventing Anthropic from continuing the alleged patent infringement.

Anthropic and the University of Tennessee representatives

The lawsuit is believed to be the first patent infringement case filed against Anthropic. It comes shortly after a California federal judge approved the company’s $1.5 billion settlement in a class-action copyright lawsuit brought by authors over the use of their works for AI training.

The outcome of the case could become another closely watched legal battle in the rapidly evolving artificial intelligence industry, where disputes over copyrights, patents and intellectual property continue to increase.

Key points:

  • University of Tennessee Research Foundation has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Anthropic.
  • The lawsuit alleges Anthropic’s AI systems violate two patents related to neural networks and machine learning.
  • The case was filed in Delaware federal court.
  • The university claims the patented technology covers AI, neuromorphic computing, and neuroscience-inspired computing.
  • The foundation is seeking monetary damages and a court order preventing further alleged infringement.
  • The lawsuit comes a day after a California judge approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion copyright settlement involving authors.

Continue Reading

Education

Central Park Medical College gaslights students into a fee reduction

Published

on

The image is AI-generated and used for illustration purposes only

LAHORE – Central Park Medical College(CPMC) on 18th July, 2026, issued a notification after students stormed the vicinity demanding a fee reduction. The notification explicitly stated that CPMC has filed an appeal with the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council(PMDC) for a revision of the fee structure of Session 2024-25 and Session 2025-26.

A student contacted an Upfront official and explained the situation, as to how the management tricked so many students. The protestors returned to their homes, satisfied with their success, until, allegedly, the principal deleted the notification claiming the fee reduction. According to the student, the principal said the students would be required to pay their original fee in full despite the notification showing otherwise.

Read more: How Is Load-Shedding Poisoning Pakistan’s Economy?

The student alleged that Central Park Medical College was taking Rs. 25 lac for the first year and Rs. 28 lac for the second year, while the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council has revised the fee to Rs. 20 lac for each year.

Read more: Why HBO Max Canceled Titans and What It Means for DC’s Future

Note: This is a developing story for further updates and videos. Visit our social handles. Upfront

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Netflix officially begins Queenstown production in New Zealand

Published

on

KARACHI – Netflix has officially begun production on Queenstown, marking the streaming giant’s first original television series commissioned in New Zealand after more than a decade of offering content in the country.

The eight-episode drama is currently being filmed on location in Queenstown, one of New Zealand’s most popular luxury ski destinations on the South Island. Set against the backdrop of the town’s affluent ski-resort community, Queenstown follows a wealthy family whose internal conflicts spill over into the lives of the people who work for them.

The story explores themes of power, loyalty, family conflict and desire.

What is Queenstown centered on?

Netflix described the series as a drama centered on “a wealthy family at war with itself,” unfolding within the glamorous yet competitive world of Queenstown’s elite. The writer and creator of Queenstown is Chloe Stearns, who also serves as an executive producer. Moreover, Glendyn Ivin will direct the series and executive-produce it, while New Zealand filmmaker Roseanne Liang will direct selected episodes.

Read more: 350,000 Google Career Certificates Open to Pakistanis

The cast of Queenstown

The cast is led by Emmy Award nominee Rufus Sewell, alongside Frances O’Connor, Alycia Debnam-Carey, and New Zealand actor Te Kohe Tuhaka. Amanda Duthie, Netflix’s Content Director for Australia and New Zealand, described the project as a significant milestone for the company.

Read more: PTA SIM Card Fines Imposed on Mobile Operators

She said that producing the first locally commissioned Netflix series in New Zealand represents an important step for the platform and praised the drama as a compelling story about class, family, and power set in the world of a luxury ski resort. On the other hand, Executive producers Jodi Matterson and Libbie Doherty also expressed confidence in the project, calling creator Chloe Stearns an exceptional new storytelling talent and predicting the series would become a favourite among audiences.

Where is the production of Queenstown taking place

Furthermore, Netflix’s original productions in the region have so far largely focused on Australia, producing successful titles including Heartbreak High, Boy Swallows Universe, and Apple Cider Vinegar.  The production has received support from the New Zealand Film Commission and the country’s Screen Production Rebate programme.

Read more: PTA recommends giving licenses to Starlink, OneWeb: PTA Chairman

Netflix has not yet announced an official release date for Queenstown.

Category Details
Series Title Queenstown
Platform Netflix
Type Original Drama Series
Episodes 8
Significance Netflix’s first original series commissioned in New Zealand
Filming Location Queenstown, South Island, New Zealand
Story Power struggles, family conflict, loyalty and desire among a wealthy family and their employees
Creator & Writer Chloe Stearns
Lead Directors Glendyn Ivin and Roseanne Liang
Main Cast Rufus Sewell, Frances O’Connor, Alycia Debnam-Carey, Te Kohe Tuhaka
Executive Producers Chloe Stearns, Glendyn Ivin, Jodi Matterson, Libbie Doherty, Jeremy Platt and Erika North
Production Support New Zealand Film Commission and Screen Production Rebate
Release Date Not announced

Key Points:

  • Netflix has started production on Queenstown, its first original series commissioned in New Zealand.
  • The drama consists of eight episodes and is being filmed in Queenstown.
  • The story revolves around a wealthy family and the people working for them amid power struggles, loyalty and desire.
  • Rufus Sewell, Frances O’Connor, Alycia Debnam-Carey and Te Kohe Tuhaka lead the cast.
  • The series is created by Chloe Stearns and directed by Glendyn Ivin and Roseanne Liang.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Paramount’s $111bn Warner Bros deal blocked by States lawsuit

Published

on

The image is AI-generated and used for illustration purposes only

KARACHI – A coalition of US state attorneys general has filed a lawsuit seeking to block Paramount’s proposed $111 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, arguing that the deal would significantly reduce competition in the entertainment industry.

The lawsuit, filed on Monday in a federal court in California, alleges that the merger violates US antitrust laws by combining two of Hollywood’s largest film studios. The states argue that the transaction would lead to higher prices, fewer theatrical releases and reduced quality and diversity of content.

Who filed the lawsuit?

The legal challenge was brought by attorneys general from Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Washington. They have asked the court to prevent Paramount from completing the deal while the case is being heard. If necessary, they also plan to seek a temporary restraining order.

Read more: What’s slowing your Windows 11 PC? Copilot can now help

According to the complaint, the merger would leave four major studios controlling more than 85 per cent of the US market for wide-release theatrical films. The states claim Paramount would hold more than 30pc of the blockbuster film distribution market, increasing its bargaining power over cinema operators.

The lawsuit argues that cinemas could be forced to surrender a larger share of ticket revenue while facing stricter conditions on discounts and complimentary tickets. As a result, theatres may increase ticket prices and reduce investment in premium experiences such as luxury seating, larger screens and upgraded concessions.

Read more: Punjab sales tax: Digital payments face tax increase

State officials also claim the merger would weaken competition in the licensing of basic cable television channels. Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery currently rank among the largest providers of cable programming, with rights to major sporting events, including March Madness and Major League Baseball broadcasts.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta said the proposed merger would harm consumers, theatres and cable distributors by reducing competition and limiting content choices.

“The unlawful merger of these two entertainment behemoths would lead to higher prices, lower quality, and less content for film and television,” Bonta said.

What was Paramount’s reaction to Antitrust claims?

Paramount dismissed the lawsuit, calling it a flawed interpretation of US antitrust law. The company argued that the combined business would be better equipped to compete with dominant technology and streaming companies such as Netflix, Amazon, and Google.

According to Paramount, the merger would create a stronger media company capable of investing in premium content while offering more opportunities for creators, workers and consumers.

Read more: Pakistan wins three medals in Physics Olympiad

The company also warned that blocking the transaction would strengthen the market position of major technology firms rather than promote competition.

Justice Department Already Approved Deal

The legal action comes despite the US Department of Justice approving Paramount’s acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery in June without requiring asset sales or other concessions.

However, the merger still requires approval from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), UK competition regulators and the European Commission.

Regulators in China, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine, Serbia and North Macedonia have already cleared the transaction, while several European countries have also approved foreign investment aspects of the deal.

Consumer Lawsuit Adds Pressure

The states’ lawsuit is not the only legal challenge facing Paramount.

Earlier this year, Paramount subscribers filed a separate lawsuit claiming the merger would reduce competition in streaming, theatrical distribution and news services. The plaintiffs argue the combined company could raise subscription prices, reduce content output and tighten control over licensing and distribution.

To address industry concerns, Paramount Chief Executive David Ellison has pledged to release at least 30 theatrical films annually with a minimum 45-day exclusive cinema window while continuing to operate Paramount and Warner Bros. as separate studios.

Read more: Korean skincare products launched in Pakistan here’s what you should know

Industry analysts, however, have questioned whether the company can sustain those commitments while managing an estimated $79 billion in debt following the merger.

Key Points:

  • A coalition of US states has filed an antitrust lawsuit to stop Paramount’s proposed $111 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery.
  • The states argue the merger would reduce competition in theatrical film distribution and cable television licensing.
  • Officials warn the deal could result in higher prices, fewer movies in cinemas, and less consumer choice.
  • Paramount rejects the allegations, saying the merger would strengthen competition against streaming giants such as Netflix, Amazon and Google.
  • The US Justice Department has already approved the transaction, but several regulatory reviews and legal challenges remain pending.

Continue Reading

About

Upfront influence about 20 million users and is the number one business and technology news network on the planet


© 2022 upfront. All Rights Reserved.

Trending

Copyright © 2026