Key Points:
-
Jurisdictional Boundary: Senior lawyers fully agree with the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) that the Supreme Court overstepped its legal bounds by ordering sweeping citywide demolitions.
-
Shifting Responsibility: Consequently, the fresh verdict places the legal onus back on the Sindh government and the Sindh Building Control Authority (SBCA) to regulate urban land use.
-
No Legalization of Illegality: Furthermore, the FCC clarified that its ruling does not validate unauthorized structures, as existing provincial frameworks must address these violations.
-
Due Process Restored: Ultimately, legal analysts point out that the initial apex court orders bypassed essential trial processes and stripped citizens of their right to a fair appeal.
KARACHI – The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) has issued a landmark detailed verdict recalling previous Supreme Court orders that led to high-profile demolition drives across Karachi, including the 15-storey Nasla Tower. Following this decision, senior constitutional experts and prominent lawyers immediately voiced their support for the FCC’s stance. They collectively maintained that the apex court had vastly exceeded its appellate jurisdiction during the initial rulings.
Nevertheless, these experts simultaneously warned that this fresh judicial intervention places a massive responsibility back onto the provincial administration. Specifically, the Sindh government and the Sindh Building Control Authority (SBCA) must now strictly monitor, regulate, and eliminate illegal constructions on public amenity plots.
Prominent Legal Context and Expert Opinions
While discussing the long-term impact of the decision, former Attorney General for Pakistan Anwar Mansoor Khan explained that the Supreme Court had clearly gone beyond its scope by directly ordering the leveling of wedding halls, residential buildings, and commercial establishments. Therefore, he highly supported the FCC’s clarification that provincial authorities must determine the fate of these properties using localized urban planning laws.
Similarly, former Sindh Advocate General Barrister Zameer Ghumro recalled that the entire controversy originated from a highly localized appeal regarding a single building in Lyari. Instead of focusing on the specific case, the apex court expanded its purview to issue sweeping mandates across the entire metropolis.
“Rulings passed upon personal whims create widespread insecurity within the real estate market, effectively driving critical investment out of the city,” observed former Sindh Bar Council Vice Chairman Syed Haider Imam Rizvi.
Regulatory Action and Structural Restructuring
Because the Supreme Court previously acted as a trial court in these matters, affected parties were fundamentally deprived of their basic right to a fair hearing. To rectify this structural anomaly, the FCC’s latest decision shifts enforcement authority back to the executive branch. Specifically, any future regularisation or demolition must happen strictly under the Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations 2002 and the Sindh Building Control Ordinance 1979.
Moreover, instead of arbitrary destruction, the provincial government is under a strict statutory duty to systematically preserve public amenities for future generations. Consequently, delinquent civil servants who aided illegal construction can now be held accountable through proper administrative due process rather than summary judicial decrees.
Case Review Overview
| Legal Metric |
Original Supreme Court Stance (2018-2019) |
New Federal Constitutional Court Position (2026) |
| Judicial Focus |
Ordered immediate citywide demolitions of disputed structures. |
Recalled orders due to judicial overreach. |
| Primary Domain |
Acted under original jurisdiction during an appeal. |
Restored regulatory power to provincial bodies. |
| Enforcement Agency |
Summary judicial mandates directly targeting properties. |
Mandated the SBCA and Sindh Government to act via due process. |
| Core Framework |
High-profile case involving Nasla Tower & Jam Sadiq Ali Park. |
Focuses on systemic preservation of public amenities. |
What did the Federal Constitutional Court decide regarding the Karachi demolitions?
The FCC recalled several sweeping Supreme Court demolition orders, ruling that while the intentions to improve the city were good, the judiciary overstepped its domain because building law enforcement belongs primarily to the provincial government.
Does this new FCC verdict legalize illegal buildings in Karachi?
No, the FCC explicitly stated that it does not confer lawful cover upon unauthorized constructions. Instead, it notes that a comprehensive local legal framework already exists for the SBCA to address these violations properly.
How does this ruling affect the rights of property owners and builders?
Because the previous Supreme Court orders bypassed standard trial procedures, this ruling restores due process, meaning properties cannot be summarily demolished without proper administrative hearings and lawful evaluation under provincial ordinances.
Read More : Jamat-i-Islami stages Lahore protest against fuel prices